Meskwaki Baby Battle

wyo_rose · 07-06-2005, 11:35 AM

Here's an article out this morning. The link at the bottom is another article with pictures of the baby and mother.

It's too bad the girl thinks her baby is better off with a white family and it's too bad the tribe won't allow mothers to enroll their kids. The enrollment issue was that way out here for a long time too.

Adoption Laws Frustrate American Indian

Wednesday July 6, 2005 9:46 AM

By TODD DVORAK

Associated Press Writer

IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) - Kelly Buffalo, an American Indian from the Meskwaki tribe, believes her newborn son will have a better future if he is adopted by a white Indiana couple. Some in her tribe disagree.

Shortly after Buffalo gave birth six weeks ago, tribal officials temporarily took custody of her son, asserting the tribe's privilege under state law to protect the cultural heritage of the child and the tribe.

On Tuesday, a tribal judge reversed its decision and granted full legal custody to the mother, who says she will continue pursuing adoption for her son, Braven. But the first step involves receiving consent from the Meskwaki Tribal Council.

``This is really frustrating,'' Buffalo, 22, told The Associated Press on Tuesday. ``It's my baby and should be my decision. I'm probably more mad at what is happening than anything else.''

Larry Lassley, executive director of the tribe, said the tribe has the authority under the Indian Child Welfare Act to intervene in adoption cases involving children of tribal members.

Lassley said the law was designed to prevent state and private adoption agencies from wrongfully taking away descendants of tribal members, as well as ensuring the option of keeping those children within the tribal community.

``The tribal council initially determined that the best interests of the child was to have the child remain within the boundaries of the Meskwaki settlement,'' Lassley said. ``It can be a very important and serious decision to make ... and a determination could be made in spite of the mother's view on who adopts her child.''

The Meskwaki tribe, which operates a lucrative casino in Tama, is the only federally recognized tribe in Iowa. Officially known as the Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi, many of the tribe's 1,200 members live on a 7,000-acre settlement along the banks of the Iowa River, 45 miles west of Cedar Rapids.

Buffalo said she has filed a petition seeking a meeting with the tribal council to make her case. A date for the meeting has not yet been set.

Even though Buffalo is a tribal member, it's unlikely the child will ever be formally enrolled in the tribe because his father is white. And under tribal tradition, women alone cannot enroll their children in the tribe, she said.

``I don't really see the purpose of why they want to keep a child around who won't benefit from staying here,'' Buffalo said

http://www.whotv.com/Global/story.asp?S=3556395

Plenty Fox · 07-06-2005, 12:49 PM

I know this is a touchy subject. I admit, I don't know anything about Meswaki's. I don't know if their tribal council has their s**t together and the community is a healthy one--or not. But, and it's a big 'but', given the other facts; that the mother has no confidence in her People (very, very sad), given that Dad is White (yeah, get over it) I think ALL options for placement ought to be considered. THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD is what is supposed to be at the root of these decisions. When the dust settles, I hope this baby has the opportunity to become a healthy, well adjusted and socialized individual.

red n black cutie · 07-08-2005, 01:29 AM

Plenty fox and Proud, I agree. Maybe there are some things wrong within the tribe or something that she doesn't want her baby there. Although depriving the child of their culture is horrible. If the baby when witht the white family would he know his culture. And on the other hand, Why would she wanted her baby in a place where (technically) it's not going to be wanted. In a sense that is what the council is doing when they wont enroll people. But again do you need a number or a card or piece of paper to tell u that you are native?

red n black cutie · 07-08-2005, 01:30 AM

sorry full of contridictions today

Blackbear · 07-14-2005, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canadian_Guy

my thoughts on this story about kelly buffalo is that she should take care of the child and it more seems that adoption is more of an ascape from responsibilty, how does she know it will get a better life? will money bring this better life I dont think so , I mean sacrifiing ones knowing of ones herritage for money etc . that dont cut if for me. Kelly buffalo needs to be andult about this and since she had the child then be an adult and raise the child

Could she be thinking about more than money? How about how that child not being enrolled will be reminded about that every day of his life? Looked at by some as not being Meskwaki and having no voice. Maybe she's not wanting to escape but trying to help him escape from what she thinks might be his treatment later in life. It's a double edged sword this enrollment crap. It does make you kinda wonder why a nation would fight so hard keep a child it won't recognize as one of it's own.

morning water · 07-14-2005, 05:02 PM

I agree with what most of you are saying. I raised four foster children and the mother was about 98% white.(all teenagers) I don't think money is the issue but I do feel like this child should have the chance to be proud of his Mesquakie heritage and the rest of his family if he has any. The requirement for enrollment sounds odd to me and why doesn't some of the girls family step up to see to this child. He didn't ask to be born!!!!

Plenty Fox · 07-14-2005, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canadian_Guy

my thoughts on this story about kelly buffalo is that she should take care of the child and it more seems that adoption is more of an ascape from responsibilty, how does she know it will get a better life? will money bring this better life I dont think so , I mean sacrifiing ones knowing of ones herritage for money etc . that dont cut if for me. Kelly buffalo needs to be andult about this and since she had the child then be an adult and raise the child

It takes TWO to make a baby. Where is Dad in all this? Does he agree to the adoption? WHITE or NOT a Dad, too, needs to step up to the plate and accept the responsibility for the life HE has created whether it is a result of 15 minutes of lust or a lifetime with a soulmate.

nativemom · 07-14-2005, 05:26 PM

I agree with you BB........we natives are hardest on each other. I don't agree with the whole enrollment process there, but they are sovereign and have that right. The poor baby.

ndnmama80 · 07-14-2005, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canadian_Guy

my thoughts on this story about kelly buffalo is that she should take care of the child and it more seems that adoption is more of an ascape from responsibilty, how does she know it will get a better life? will money bring this better life I dont think so , I mean sacrifiing ones knowing of ones herritage for money etc . that dont cut if for me. Kelly buffalo needs to be andult about this and since she had the child then be an adult and raise the child

I understand what you're sayin, any mother should be woman enough to take care of the child she created. But as a single mother of three, I been through hell and back dealin w/ all the drama I went through havin my kids. I don't know Kelly's age or the issues she's dealin with and yes, it's sad she's makin the decision that she is. But if she feels she is not capable of takin care of her child, it's better the child go to a family who wants it, instead of being with a mother who doesn't. That child doesn't need to be in a household in which it is unwanted and who will probably be subjected to a miserable life. I agree that it's not for sure that the baby's life will be better just cuz it's with a family who has the means to support it. But I don't believe it is safe to have the child stay with a mother who doesn't want it.

Blackbear · 07-15-2005, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nativemom

I agree with you BB........we natives are hardest on each other. I don't agree with the whole enrollment process there, but they are sovereign and have that right. The poor baby.

Enrolled or not, the child is half meskwaki and I agree that he should have the right to his heritage as well, but why can't that be up to him? He will benefit from the community only if the community will treat him the same as it would the enrolled members.. but man I've seen how alot of the disenfranchised are treated and it is often not good. I've talked to full bloods who are'nt recognized because one parent comes from across the border talk with bitterness cause they know who they are and no nation will recognize them. If the nation wants the child then should'nt they want the child totally?

nativemom · 07-15-2005, 10:23 AM

yes.........I just keep thinking about the baby and because of all of this controversy, the baby has had time to bond with the mother and vice versa. It is going to make the parting even harder for both. Where's the babies relatives???? Why doesn't another Meskwaki step forward??? Or even other natives?? I just feel bad for the baby and the mother.

Plenty Fox · 07-15-2005, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackbear

Enrolled or not, the child is half meskwaki and I agree that he should have the right to his heritage as well, but why can't that be up to him? He will benefit from the community only if the community will treat him the same as it would the enrolled members.. but man I've seen how alot of the disenfranchised are treated and it is often not good. I've talked to full bloods who are'nt recognized because one parent comes from across the border talk with bitterness cause they know who they are and no nation will recognize them. If the nation wants the child then should'nt they want the child totally?

Amen. There are too many 'disenfranchised' mixed blood Natives who feel lost--not totally accepted in either world. Just look at the attitudes about mixed bloods out here? Sheesh! Folks are always being accused of not being NDN enough; when for reasons beyond their control they were not brought up in the culture. I say, quit pulling the child apart and agree with Blackbear. In the end It doesn't matter how everyone else says the kid should be 'labelled', it is the self-image of the child itself; and any half-baked 'label' put on the kid, even if well meaning, is damaging.

Plenty Fox · 07-15-2005, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ndnmama80

I understand what you're sayin, any mother should be woman enough to take care of the child she created. But as a single mother of three, I been through hell and back dealin w/ all the drama I went through havin my kids. I don't know Kelly's age or the issues she's dealin with and yes, it's sad she's makin the decision that she is. But if she feels she is not capable of takin care of her child, it's better the child go to a family who wants it, instead of being with a mother who doesn't. That child doesn't need to be in a household in which it is unwanted and who will probably be subjected to a miserable life. I agree that it's not for sure that the baby's life will be better just cuz it's with a family who has the means to support it. But I don't believe it is safe to have the child stay with a mother who doesn't want it.

Thank you so much, truly.

Angie

07-06-2005, 11:35 AM	#1 (permalink)
wyo_rose Teenah's Too Cool Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Fort Washakie Posts: 8,037 Blog Entries: 2	Meskwaki Baby Battle Here's an article out this morning. The link at the bottom is another article with pictures of the baby and mother. It's too bad the girl thinks her baby is better off with a white family and it's too bad the tribe won't allow mothers to enroll their kids. The enrollment issue was that way out here for a long time too. Adoption Laws Frustrate American Indian Wednesday July 6, 2005 9:46 AM By TODD DVORAK Associated Press Writer IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) - Kelly Buffalo, an American Indian from the Meskwaki tribe, believes her newborn son will have a better future if he is adopted by a white Indiana couple. Some in her tribe disagree. Shortly after Buffalo gave birth six weeks ago, tribal officials temporarily took custody of her son, asserting the tribe's privilege under state law to protect the cultural heritage of the child and the tribe. On Tuesday, a tribal judge reversed its decision and granted full legal custody to the mother, who says she will continue pursuing adoption for her son, Braven. But the first step involves receiving consent from the Meskwaki Tribal Council. ``This is really frustrating,'' Buffalo, 22, told The Associated Press on Tuesday. ``It's my baby and should be my decision. I'm probably more mad at what is happening than anything else.'' Larry Lassley, executive director of the tribe, said the tribe has the authority under the Indian Child Welfare Act to intervene in adoption cases involving children of tribal members. Lassley said the law was designed to prevent state and private adoption agencies from wrongfully taking away descendants of tribal members, as well as ensuring the option of keeping those children within the tribal community. ``The tribal council initially determined that the best interests of the child was to have the child remain within the boundaries of the Meskwaki settlement,'' Lassley said. ``It can be a very important and serious decision to make ... and a determination could be made in spite of the mother's view on who adopts her child.'' The Meskwaki tribe, which operates a lucrative casino in Tama, is the only federally recognized tribe in Iowa. Officially known as the Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi, many of the tribe's 1,200 members live on a 7,000-acre settlement along the banks of the Iowa River, 45 miles west of Cedar Rapids. Buffalo said she has filed a petition seeking a meeting with the tribal council to make her case. A date for the meeting has not yet been set. Even though Buffalo is a tribal member, it's unlikely the child will ever be formally enrolled in the tribe because his father is white. And under tribal tradition, women alone cannot enroll their children in the tribe, she said. ``I don't really see the purpose of why they want to keep a child around who won't benefit from staying here,'' Buffalo said http://www.whotv.com/Global/story.asp?S=3556395 __________________ Don't take life so seriously! It's not permanent.

07-06-2005, 12:49 PM	#2 (permalink)
Plenty Fox meeeeeeeeeeee Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Upstairs Posts: 951	I know this is a touchy subject. I admit, I don't know anything about Meswaki's. I don't know if their tribal council has their st together and the community is a healthy one--or not. But, and it's a big 'but', given the other facts; that the mother has no confidence in her People (very, very sad), given that Dad is White (yeah, get over it) I think ALL options for placement ought to be considered. THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD is what is supposed to be at the root of these decisions. When the dust settles, I hope this baby has the opportunity to become a healthy, well adjusted and socialized individual. __________________ Damme ape’semmai, "Andabichidaiboonee’ gimmadu’i.Wihyu memme hainjinee’ nahandu’i. Enne wizha sudei’ tsaangu mabizhiahkande," mai. The Creator said, "A foreign race of white people will come, who will become your friends. You should treat them well." The Creator sure had a strange sense of humor!**

07-14-2005, 05:26 PM	#8 (permalink)
nativemom Teen Dancer Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: North Dakota Posts: 263	I agree with you BB........we natives are hardest on each other. I don't agree with the whole enrollment process there, but they are sovereign and have that right. The poor baby. __________________ It does not require many words to speak the truth. Chief Joseph

07-15-2005, 10:23 AM	#11 (permalink)
nativemom Teen Dancer Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: North Dakota Posts: 263	yes.........I just keep thinking about the baby and because of all of this controversy, the baby has had time to bond with the mother and vice versa. It is going to make the parting even harder for both. Where's the babies relatives???? Why doesn't another Meskwaki step forward??? Or even other natives?? I just feel bad for the baby and the mother. __________________ It does not require many words to speak the truth. Chief Joseph

07-08-2005, 01:29 AM	#3 (permalink)
red n black cutie Tiny Tot Dancer Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Omaha Posts: 49	Plenty fox and Proud, I agree. Maybe there are some things wrong within the tribe or something that she doesn't want her baby there. Although depriving the child of their culture is horrible. If the baby when witht the white family would he know his culture. And on the other hand, Why would she wanted her baby in a place where (technically) it's not going to be wanted. In a sense that is what the council is doing when they wont enroll people. But again do you need a number or a card or piece of paper to tell u that you are native?

07-08-2005, 01:30 AM	#4 (permalink)
red n black cutie Tiny Tot Dancer Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Omaha Posts: 49	sorry full of contridictions today

07-14-2005, 05:02 PM	#6 (permalink)
morning water Tiny Tot Dancer Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 72	I agree with what most of you are saying. I raised four foster children and the mother was about 98% white.(all teenagers) I don't think money is the issue but I do feel like this child should have the chance to be proud of his Mesquakie heritage and the rest of his family if he has any. The requirement for enrollment sounds odd to me and why doesn't some of the girls family step up to see to this child. He didn't ask to be born!!!!

07-15-2005, 04:14 PM	#14 (permalink)
Mato Winyan Gangster of Love Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Indiana Posts: 5,497