|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Space Cowboy
![]() Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,622
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ruling Could Change Tax Status Of Indian-Owned Land
************************************************** *************
This message is reprinted under the Fair Use Doctrine of International Copyright Law: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html ************************************************** ************* FROM: THE ASHEVILLE (NORTH CAROLINA) CITIZEN-TIMES NEWSPAPER http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/p...1/NEWS01/501300 06/1001 Ruling Could Change Tax Status Of Indian-Owned Land Eastern Band officials don’t think N.Y. case will affect them photo: Steve Dixon/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER Patrons try their luck earlier this month at Harrah’s Cherokee Casino, which was opened by the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians in 1997. A Supreme Court case that originated in New York state may affect the tax exempt status of some American Indian-owned land. By John Machacek GANNETT NEWS SERVICE and Andre A. Rodriguez STAFF WRITER January 31, 2005 6:00 am WASHINGTON — Indian tribes across the country are watching for a Supreme Court ruling they fear could drastically alter the legal foundation of Indian land ownership. The case comes out of central New York, where the tiny town of Sherrill is demanding that the Oneida Indian Nation pay taxes on land the tribe bought that is home to a convenience store and textile plant. The tribe says the property is sovereign territory and is tax-exempt under federal law. Using profits from its hugely successful Turning Stone resort and casino, the Oneidas have been able to bypass stalled legal efforts to reclaim ancestral lands. The tribe has bought nearly 17,000 acres in Oneida and Madison counties since the casino opened in 1993. Sherrill, a town of about 3,000 people and 2.2 square miles just a few minutes ’ drive from the growing casino-resort, wants to tax an Oneida-owned gasoline station-convenience store and a plant that makes T-shirts and sweatshirts. Sherrill officials argue that the Oneidas’ refusal to pay about $3,000 a year in property taxes on the commercial parcels shifts more of the tax burden to non-Indian property owners. Two lower courts already have ruled in favor of the Oneidas, saying the two properties are part of Indian country and therefore entitled to federal protection. The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on the case Jan. 11. The Sherrill case deals only with the taxability of Indian-owned land, but tribes nationwide are watching the case closely, fearing that the court could alter the legal foundation of Indian land ownership. Albert Crowe, chairman of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians tribal council in Western North Carolina, said a majority of the land owned by the Eastern Band is held in federal trust through the Department of Interior and is exempt from taxes. He doesn’t think that the outcome of the Oneida case will affect the tax status of these properties. However, the Eastern Band does own other property that is not yet held in the trust, less than 1,000 acres according to Eastern Band Attorney General David Nash. “The Eastern Band has an application to Department of the Interior through the Bureau of Indian Affairs to put land into trust status,” Crowe said. It’s a long, drawn-out process, but “the tribe will continue to pay taxes on this land until it is placed in trust status.” The 143-acre Ravensford tract the tribe recently acquired through a land swap with the National Parks Service went directly into trust under the terms of the land exchange bill, Nash said. Nash also doesn’t think the outcome of this case will affect the tax status of lands held by the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indian.” “As far as I know, the specific nature of (the Oneida) case isn’t paralleled down here,” he said. But Robert Odawi Porter, a Cornell University law professor specializing in Indian law said a ruling against Oneidas “could be cataclysmic for Indian nations, certainly for the traditional nations in New York.” “When you start tinkering with the infrastructure of the way in which Indian land is held and protected by federal law, you create openings for predatory actions by states and local governments,” Porter said.
__________________
Don't worry that it's not good enough for anyone else to hear... just sing, sing a song. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Indian Men, Indian Women, White Women | this1ndnchic | Chit Chat | 105 | 04-06-2007 06:29 PM |
| Natives Must Educate America or Perish! | luvstraightdancrs | Native Issues | 6 | 08-08-2005 10:56 AM |
| Revised executive order promotes Indian education | Smokin' Ace | Native Issues | 2 | 11-09-2004 12:51 AM |
| South Dakota Indian voter turnout a record high | Smokin' Ace | Native Issues | 0 | 11-05-2004 03:00 PM |
| Walking the Land With Pride Once More | Blackbear | Native Issues | 4 | 10-01-2004 05:17 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 PM.
Debt Help | Mortgages | Best Credit Cards | Reserve hotel in New York | Remortgages










Linear Mode

